Message247238
> Why do we need a dedicated section in Built-in Types about Comparisons?
It is nice to have some of that information collected together. I think people learn about comparison logic as a single topic rather than piecemeal type by type.
To Jim's point, the discussion of "is" and "is not" should probably be factored-out (their meaning is type-invariant and is not overridable with a dunder method). Also, they don't have the same reflective logic as the rich comparisons. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-07-24 01:38:54 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, docs@python, martin.panter, Jim.Jewett |
2015-07-24 01:38:53 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1437701933.93.0.896957354256.issue22000@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-07-24 01:38:53 | rhettinger | link | issue22000 messages |
2015-07-24 01:38:53 | rhettinger | create | |
|