Message246885
The original Python-ideas thread: <https://www.marc.info/?t=143558954500004>
If you want shorter field names, how about just r and w (as they are currently documented)?
os.write(our_pipe.w, b"data")
os.read(our_pipe.r, 1024)
“Input” and “output” would also work for me (though I am also happy with read, read_fd, etc). However it does seem a bit novel; in my experience people tend to say pipes have read and write ends, not inputs and outputs.
os.write(our_pipe.input, b"data")
os.read(our_pipe.output, 1024) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-07-18 05:07:52 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, ethan.furman, Rosuav, yselivanov, jonathan.slenders |
2015-07-18 05:07:52 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1437196072.64.0.487392046134.issue24536@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-07-18 05:07:52 | martin.panter | link | issue24536 messages |
2015-07-18 05:07:51 | martin.panter | create | |
|