➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author scoder
Recipients benjamin.peterson, candide, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano
Date 2015-07-11.18:43:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1436640219.63.0.362282223132.issue24612@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
It looks like perfectly valid syntax to me and I cannot see why it should be semantically rejected. I disagree that it shouldn't be changed. I think it's a (minor) bug that should eventually get fixed.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-07-11 18:43:39scodersetrecipients: + scoder, benjamin.peterson, steven.daprano, serhiy.storchaka, candide
2015-07-11 18:43:39scodersetmessageid: <1436640219.63.0.362282223132.issue24612@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-07-11 18:43:39scoderlinkissue24612 messages
2015-07-11 18:43:39scodercreate