Message235138
I can live with the wording of StringIO, but personally prefer my v2 patch. I now understand that calling close() for Bytes and StringIO objects is intended to immediately free the memory buffer holding the file data (like deleting a file in Windows). So I think it would be better to document this as a property of the whole object, rather than a special exception for each of the getbuffer(), getvalue() non-file-API methods.
I’m happy to propose a similar wording for the StringIO class if you want to make them consistent. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-02-01 00:57:26 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
2015-02-01 00:57:25 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1422752245.98.0.86419368712.issue23099@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-02-01 00:57:25 | martin.panter | link | issue23099 messages |
2015-02-01 00:57:25 | martin.panter | create | |
|