This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients bukzor, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner
Date 2014-10-24.22:39:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1414190375.32.0.167383577215.issue22722@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> This seems objectionable since set_inheritable() code is invoked
> twice, where I'd prefer to invoke it zero times (or at most once).

Does it make a difference in the grand scheme of things? If you're forking a process, you're usually doing something heavy enough that two calls to set_inheritable() will end up invisible.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-10-24 22:39:35pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, vstinner, r.david.murray, bukzor
2014-10-24 22:39:35pitrousetmessageid: <1414190375.32.0.167383577215.issue22722@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-10-24 22:39:35pitroulinkissue22722 messages
2014-10-24 22:39:35pitroucreate