➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients gvanrossum, vstinner, wabu, yselivanov
Date 2014-10-21.20:41:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJ+Uezs0dw2-hwzeRCfB=3mco_k=cEFPk7sffBrM8XpwJg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <5446C428.7090509@fooserv.net>
Content 
Victor, do you think this needs a unittest? It seems kind of difficult to
test for whether memory fills up (the machine may get wedged if it does :-).

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:39 PM, wabu <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> wabu added the comment:
>
> thanks a lot, the fix works!
>
> On 21.10.2014 22:16, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >
> > Guido van Rossum added the comment:
> >
> > Can you confirm that this patch fixes the problem (without you needing
> the workaround in your own code)?
> >
> > ----------
> > keywords: +patch
> > Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36989/fix22685.patch
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue22685>
> > _______________________________________
> >
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22685>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2014-10-21 20:41:59gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, vstinner, yselivanov, wabu
2014-10-21 20:41:59gvanrossumlinkissue22685 messages
2014-10-21 20:41:59gvanrossumcreate