Message229097
> You seem to be confusing the feature itself with the implementation.
> The fact that there is an acceptable implementation is another matter
> (and subtest_in_range.diff is not an implementation).
You yourself were calling it a "solution".
A feature proposal should either have a description of the new feature, or a patch. Since there is no feature description, I reviewed the patch as being an implementation of the desired feature.
> This feature is generally useful.
As described in the issue, I disagree. If the intended feature is more comprehensive, please supply an adequate description or a patch that implements it. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-10-11 17:08:17 | georg.brandl | set | recipients:
+ georg.brandl, vstinner, r.david.murray, michael.foord, xdegaye |
2014-10-11 17:08:16 | georg.brandl | set | messageid: <1413047296.99.0.564327026295.issue22607@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-10-11 17:08:16 | georg.brandl | link | issue22607 messages |
2014-10-11 17:08:16 | georg.brandl | create | |
|