Message227794
We never promise that the messages won't change (they are not part of the API), so that part isn't a problem. We do try to be backward compatible there when it comes to args beyond the message text. I don't think unpickleability is an issue; at least there isn't any discussion of it in PEP 3161, and I don't remember any around the implementation.
I think this is fine. I don't think we should worry about someone who is actually using rawval/rest pulled out of the exception args. You could put a porting note in What's New, but my guess is that the chances of anyone being inconvenienced by this are pretty near to zero. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-09-29 11:02:21 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, fdrake, Claudiu.Popa, lukasz.langa |
2014-09-29 11:02:21 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1411988541.11.0.421972054426.issue21159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-09-29 11:02:21 | r.david.murray | link | issue21159 messages |
2014-09-29 11:02:20 | r.david.murray | create | |
|