Author dan.oreilly
Recipients Albert.Strasheim, aljungberg, asksol, bquinlan, dan.oreilly, gdb, gkcn, haypo, hongqn, jcea, jnoller, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, vlasovskikh
Date 2014-09-10.15:16:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1410362187.25.0.733980222976.issue9205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Is it possible to have this issue re-opened, so that the new patch is more likely to get attention? Or should I create a new issue for the multiprocessing patch?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-09-10 15:16:27dan.oreillysetrecipients: + dan.oreilly, jcea, bquinlan, pitrou, haypo, jnoller, hongqn, asksol, vlasovskikh, neologix, gdb, Albert.Strasheim, aljungberg, python-dev, sbt, gkcn
2014-09-10 15:16:27dan.oreillysetmessageid: <1410362187.25.0.733980222976.issue9205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-09-10 15:16:27dan.oreillylinkissue9205 messages
2014-09-10 15:16:27dan.oreillycreate