This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients CristianCantoro, r.david.murray
Date 2014-08-26.13:20:28
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1409059228.2.0.127109257878.issue22277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
This seems like a good idea, based on the use case presented in the stackoverflow question.

This would be an enhancement, so it can only go in 3.5.

Please submit a patch without the pep 8 changes, so we can easily see what the patch is actually changing.  As far as the API goes, since the controls are passed to subprocess, might it be a good idea to make the API for these keywords the same as the one subprocess uses?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-08-26 13:20:28r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, CristianCantoro
2014-08-26 13:20:28r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1409059228.2.0.127109257878.issue22277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-08-26 13:20:28r.david.murraylinkissue22277 messages
2014-08-26 13:20:28r.david.murraycreate