Message224321
The 2.7_2 patch looks good to me. I won't rule on the backwards compatibility implications, although I agree that this is unlikely to cause a regression (it would only if somebody updated the standard library only, *and* would use data= for PhotoImage). I'm unsure whether it was possible at all so far to use data= (with whatever argument); if you could have passed a non-buffer object successfully, this would break now. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-07-30 16:09:38 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, terry.reedy, gpolo, docs@python, python-dev, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
2014-07-30 16:09:38 | loewis | set | messageid: <1406736578.27.0.372105411407.issue21580@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-07-30 16:09:38 | loewis | link | issue21580 messages |
2014-07-30 16:09:38 | loewis | create | |
|