Message224084
Good point. Asyncio definitely should not share event loops across forked processes. However, I don't like the dependency on multiprocessing (even though it's in the stdlib) -- can't the policy just use os.getpid()?
Also, I've got a feeling that maybe the pid should be part of the policy state instead of the loop state? The policy could just reset self._local when the pid doesn't match. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-07-26 19:55:30 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, vstinner, yselivanov, dan.oreilly |
2014-07-26 19:55:30 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1406404530.73.0.347486446723.issue22087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-07-26 19:55:30 | gvanrossum | link | issue22087 messages |
2014-07-26 19:55:30 | gvanrossum | create | |
|