This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients dan.oreilly, gvanrossum, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2014-07-26.19:55:30
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1406404530.73.0.347486446723.issue22087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Good point.  Asyncio definitely should not share event loops across forked processes.  However, I don't like the dependency on multiprocessing (even though it's in the stdlib) -- can't the policy just use os.getpid()?

Also, I've got a feeling that maybe the pid should be part of the policy state instead of the loop state?  The policy could just reset self._local when the pid doesn't match.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-26 19:55:30gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, vstinner, yselivanov, dan.oreilly
2014-07-26 19:55:30gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1406404530.73.0.347486446723.issue22087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-26 19:55:30gvanrossumlinkissue22087 messages
2014-07-26 19:55:30gvanrossumcreate