➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients BreamoreBoy, bkabrda, dmalcolm, docs@python, eric.araujo, ncoghlan
Date 2014-07-16.02:15:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1405476926.63.0.254675995964.issue16237@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Actually, with RHEL and CentOS 7 out the door, I believe we could potentially just rip the whole mess out of the upstream project.

Slavek, this is about a hack Dave and I put into bdist_rpm to get Python 3 packages building correctly on RHEL 6. I believe the underlying issue with not specifying the interpreter version has been fixed for 7,so can we just get rid of the workaround now? Or at least double check the non-portability issue only affects 6 and close this as wontfix?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-16 02:15:26ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, eric.araujo, dmalcolm, docs@python, BreamoreBoy, bkabrda
2014-07-16 02:15:26ncoghlansetmessageid: <1405476926.63.0.254675995964.issue16237@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-16 02:15:26ncoghlanlinkissue16237 messages
2014-07-16 02:15:25ncoghlancreate