Message221833
I tried to run those timings again and the values I got from the terminal are close to the ones I got from the interactive interpreter.
I'm not sure why when I wrote those examples I got such different values.
It would be fine with me to update them and avoid confusion.
> In command-line invocation the gc is disabled.
> And timit.repeat() is used instead of timit.timit().
Looking at the current code it seems to me that the command-line uses timeit.repeat(), that repeat calls timeit.timeit(), and that timeit.timeit() disables the gc. Maybe back then it was different; that would explain why I got different results. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-06-29 09:12:09 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients:
+ ezio.melotti, rhettinger, steven.daprano, claymation, docs@python, BreamoreBoy, serhiy.storchaka |
2014-06-29 09:12:09 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1404033129.44.0.292126458168.issue18588@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-06-29 09:12:09 | ezio.melotti | link | issue18588 messages |
2014-06-29 09:12:08 | ezio.melotti | create | |
|