Message 221398 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	cjw296
Recipients	cjw296, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2014-06-24.06:36:16
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<53A91C5C.5020403@simplistix.co.uk>
In-reply-to	<1403591624.51.0.81538462771.issue21820@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
No, it would not be enough. Please see the report above, the repr of non-strings may be large, but it's often intended that way and all of the string should be displayed. It really is a shame that no API was provided to control this behaviour. I actually consider that a bug, Michael, could it be considered as such so that we can fix it in 3.4 rather than having to wait until 3.5 to fix the problem?

No, it would not be enough.

Please see the report above, the repr of non-strings may be large, but 
it's often intended that way and all of the string should be displayed.

It really is a shame that no API was provided to control this behaviour. 
I actually consider that a bug, Michael, could it be considered as such 
so that we can fix it in 3.4 rather than having to wait until 3.5 to fix 
the problem?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-06-24 06:36:16	cjw296	set	recipients: + cjw296, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, serhiy.storchaka
2014-06-24 06:36:16	cjw296	link	issue21820 messages
2014-06-24 06:36:16	cjw296	create