This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients BreamoreBoy, eric.araujo, kristjan.jonsson, michael.foord, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, stutzbach, zach.ware
Date 2014-06-18.10:06:38
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1403085998.84.0.619745539188.issue14534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Class decorator approach looks less obvious to me. Looking at current standard mixing approach I understand what it do and why. But encountering the unittest.base_class decorator, I need to look in the documentation and/or sources to understand how it works.

IMHO this decorator adds a burden for readers (which needs to learn yet one thing) and adds only small benefit for whose writers which use IDE (not me).
History
Date User Action Args
2014-06-18 10:06:38serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, stutzbach, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, BreamoreBoy, zach.ware
2014-06-18 10:06:38serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1403085998.84.0.619745539188.issue14534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-06-18 10:06:38serhiy.storchakalinkissue14534 messages
2014-06-18 10:06:38serhiy.storchakacreate