Message 218257 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, hynek, pitrou, stutzbach
Date	2014-05-11.11:25:05
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1399807506.68.0.880743038196.issue21471@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
The docs for subprocess.Popen seem to imply that line-buffering is always available. However, bufsize=1 is a special value only when open the pipes in text mode, i.e. when "universal newlines" are enabled. In the short term, we should probably fix the subprocess docs. In the long term, perhaps we can add a line buffering capability to BufferedWriter?

The docs for subprocess.Popen seem to imply that line-buffering is always available. However, bufsize=1 is a special value only when open the pipes in text mode, i.e. when "universal newlines" are enabled.

In the short term, we should probably fix the subprocess docs.
In the long term, perhaps we can add a line buffering capability to BufferedWriter?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-05-11 11:25:06	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, benjamin.peterson, stutzbach, hynek
2014-05-11 11:25:06	pitrou	set	messageid: <1399807506.68.0.880743038196.issue21471@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-05-11 11:25:06	pitrou	link	issue21471 messages
2014-05-11 11:25:05	pitrou	create