Message217412
That could make sense, dunno.
Note that the bz2 module uses a harcoded 8K value.
Note that the buffer size should probably be passed to the open() call.
Also, the allocation is quite peculiar: it uses an exponential buffer
size, starting at a tiny value:
202 # Starts small, scales exponentially
203 self.min_readsize = 100
In short, I think the overall buffering should be rewritten :-) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-04-28 20:08:46 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, skip.montanaro, pitrou, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka, tiwilliam |
2014-04-28 20:08:46 | neologix | link | issue20962 messages |
2014-04-28 20:08:46 | neologix | create | |
|