Message 215847 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	josh.r
Recipients	garybernhardt, gdr@garethrees.org, josh.r, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, skrah, vstinner
Date	2014-04-09.21:26:13
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1397078773.69.0.876869188125.issue20539@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Mark, you said: > OverflowError seems to have the majority vote. I'll change it to that. But your most recent patch seems to have gone back to ValueError for both cases. Is there a reason for that? FWIW, I favor OverflowError as the "too large" type, though I prefer the less hyperbolic phrasing of the error message in the new patch.

Mark, you said:

> OverflowError seems to have the majority vote. I'll change it to that.

But your most recent patch seems to have gone back to ValueError for both cases. Is there a reason for that? FWIW, I favor OverflowError as the "too large" type, though I prefer the less hyperbolic phrasing of the error message in the new patch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-04-09 21:26:13	josh.r	set	recipients: + josh.r, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, skrah, gdr@garethrees.org, garybernhardt
2014-04-09 21:26:13	josh.r	set	messageid: <1397078773.69.0.876869188125.issue20539@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-09 21:26:13	josh.r	link	issue20539 messages
2014-04-09 21:26:13	josh.r	create