Message 21288 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	loewis
Recipients
Date	2007-03-23.13:35:34
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to

Content
Ok, I reverted this patch in r54543 and r54544. arigo, what do you think about the alternative patch (fakeclose.diff), which drops the ssl object in FakeSocket.close()? I don't think we can add an explicit close operation for 2.5.x to SSL objects, so we have to continue to rely on reference counting. File Added: fakeclose.diff

Ok, I reverted this patch in r54543 and r54544. 

arigo, what do you think about the alternative patch (fakeclose.diff), which drops the ssl object in FakeSocket.close()? I don't think we can add an explicit close operation for 2.5.x to SSL objects, so we have to continue to rely on reference counting.

File Added: fakeclose.diff

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-08-23 14:22:54	admin	link	issue978833 messages
2007-08-23 14:22:54	admin	create