Message211718
> Antoine: would it be reasonable to rework the implementation of
> subTest in a way that permitted us to revert the changes to
> expectedFailure?
I can't tell you for sure, but certainly not in an easy way. Expected failures were the most delicate feature to keep compatible when adding subtests.
(in other words: not for 3.4, IMO) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-02-20 10:54:55 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, barry, larry, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, michael.foord, thomir |
2014-02-20 10:54:55 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1392893695.41.0.237844634546.issue20687@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-02-20 10:54:55 | pitrou | link | issue20687 messages |
2014-02-20 10:54:55 | pitrou | create | |
|