➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author maciej.szulik
Recipients BreamoreBoy, Juarez.Bochi, Julian.Gindi, adam-collard, ajaksu2, alanvgreen, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, guettli, jafo, josh-sf, maciej.szulik, mark.dickinson, petre, sonderblade, tiktuk, vajrasky
Date 2013-12-20.23:28:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1387582099.96.0.468562291661.issue1100942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I'm attaching merged and fixed patch (issue1100942_full.patch). Though during testing I found one issue with the patch: during checking for time part in date class I'm using (in _datetimemodule.c->date_strptime) DATE_GET_HOUR etc, but when given time parts are 0's then the test fails. Should I leave the patch as is, because possibility for 0's is very low or should I check the format string for time parts existence? Any further advice is appreciated.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-12-20 23:28:20maciej.szuliksetrecipients: + maciej.szulik, jafo, guettli, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, sonderblade, alanvgreen, ajaksu2, josh-sf, cvrebert, tiktuk, adam-collard, BreamoreBoy, berker.peksag, Juarez.Bochi, petre, vajrasky, Julian.Gindi
2013-12-20 23:28:19maciej.szuliksetmessageid: <1387582099.96.0.468562291661.issue1100942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-12-20 23:28:19maciej.szuliklinkissue1100942 messages
2013-12-20 23:28:19maciej.szulikcreate