Message206379
> Antoine, if I understand you correctly, you are saying that any type
> that defines __index__ is an integer, and should therefore also define
> __int__, in which case Python can just use __int__ and not worry about
> __index__?
... is an integer-like, yes.
> While I am beginning to agree that an integer type needs to implement
> both __int__ and __index__, it still remains true that Python needs to
> call __index__ if what it needs is already a real, true int, and not
> just something that can be truncated or otherwise converted into an
> int -- such as float.
Of course. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-12-16 22:15:20 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, gvanrossum, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, eric.smith, Arfrever, skrah, ethan.furman, serhiy.storchaka |
2013-12-16 22:15:20 | pitrou | link | issue19995 messages |
2013-12-16 22:15:20 | pitrou | create | |
|