This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients gvanrossum, vstinner
Date 2013-11-17.23:58:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1384732696.91.0.045583492523.issue19635@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't think it's worth complicating the code for this (except perhaps by making the tests fail more gracefully).

The tasks and futures modules import various things from concurrent.futures (some exceptions, and some constants for wait()).

If a platform doesn't have threads, asyncio is not very useful anyway -- you can't create network connections or servers because of the way getaddrinfo() is called.

I recall that this was reported before and I decided I just didn't care.

Who would be using such an old FreeBSD version anyway (while wanting to use a bleeding edge Python version and the bleeding edge asyncio package)?
History
Date User Action Args
2013-11-17 23:58:16gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, vstinner
2013-11-17 23:58:16gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1384732696.91.0.045583492523.issue19635@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-11-17 23:58:16gvanrossumlinkissue19635 messages
2013-11-17 23:58:16gvanrossumcreate