Message201753
The link you mention only deals with the DNS side of things, this issue is specifically not about that, it's about the URI/URL side of things which is a very important distinction in this case.
I'm also not entirely sure I agree with the sentiment of "it's a mess anyway" so lets ignore the RFC. There's an RFC for a reason and if more implementations started to behave accordingly the mess would clear itself up instead of becoming even more of a nightmare.
I can agree with the practical over strict approach though. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-10-30 17:35:39 | daenney | set | recipients:
+ daenney, orsenthil, r.david.murray |
2013-10-30 17:35:39 | daenney | set | messageid: <1383154539.52.0.445062117813.issue19451@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-10-30 17:35:39 | daenney | link | issue19451 messages |
2013-10-30 17:35:39 | daenney | create | |
|