This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2013-10-08.03:11:38
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1381201899.11.0.222782589198.issue19187@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
If sets need to be hacked-up to accommodate this, I would like to draft the patch for it that I think will be cleaner.

FWIW, I'm dubious that there will be any benefit from this at all.  The savings of one-pointer is the dictionary is likely to be insignificant compared to the size of the string object themselves.

Also, I think sets conceptually are not the right choice of data structure because they are primarily about membership testing and not about looking up values.   Incorporating this kind of hack will make my other set optimization efforts more difficult.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-10-08 03:11:39rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka
2013-10-08 03:11:39rhettingersetmessageid: <1381201899.11.0.222782589198.issue19187@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-10-08 03:11:39rhettingerlinkissue19187 messages
2013-10-08 03:11:38rhettingercreate