Message196962
Oops! The docs are wrong - a negative timeout actually raises:
ValueError: timeout value must be strictly positive
unless the timeout is exactly -1. All the more reason to ensure that a negative waittime isn't passed.
I opened a different issue about the doc glitch. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-09-04 21:57:42 | tim.peters | set | recipients:
+ tim.peters, jcea, csernazs, ncoghlan, pitrou, grahamd, neologix, python-dev, Tamas.K |
2013-09-04 21:57:42 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1378331862.56.0.105473555243.issue18808@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-09-04 21:57:42 | tim.peters | link | issue18808 messages |
2013-09-04 21:57:42 | tim.peters | create | |
|