Message 19686 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	arkadini
Recipients
Date	2006-02-09.15:20:12
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to

Content
Logged In: YES user_id=1346917 Unfortunately r42253 breaks things on win32 (at least on my machine). By default FD_SETSIZE is 64 (winsock.h, winsock2.h). Even if the check from select module WAS included, that would end up in 512. Most of the time, first socket I create after starting python gets a fd > 900. What is a reasonable value for FD_SETSIZE then? 1024? Compared to the default value of 64 doesn't look that reasonable, though... Are there plans to "elaborate" on the last fix?

Logged In: YES 
user_id=1346917

Unfortunately r42253 breaks things on win32 (at least on my
machine).

By default FD_SETSIZE is 64 (winsock.h, winsock2.h). Even if
the check from select module WAS included, that would end up
in 512. Most of the time, first socket I create after
starting python gets a fd > 900.

What is a reasonable value for FD_SETSIZE then? 1024?
Compared to the default value of 64 doesn't look that
reasonable, though...

Are there plans to "elaborate" on the last fix?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-08-23 14:19:22	admin	link	issue876637 messages
2007-08-23 14:19:22	admin	create