Message193643
> Charles-François's point about the algorithmic complexity is
> legitimate, so I think he was actually waiting for you to amend
> your patch ;)
This doesn't seems to be the actual issue as it would require a big change for something that wasn't proven important... The old behavior is still O(1) in the new implementation.
I might change that, but can someone give me an actual idea to implement that? Also, this can be done on another patch.
** The real problem **
I pointed out one issue about which conditions should be considered when waking up and there was no answer: http://bugs.python.org/msg190556
Also, Richard Oudkerk wrote he was expecting "wait_for_any() return a list": http://bugs.python.org/msg190597
I need to get feedback about the first one to change the second one. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-07-24 13:03:42 | JBernardo | set | recipients:
+ JBernardo, rhettinger, pitrou, neologix, sbt |
2013-07-24 13:03:42 | JBernardo | set | messageid: <1374671022.02.0.933784909319.issue18078@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-07-24 13:03:42 | JBernardo | link | issue18078 messages |
2013-07-24 13:03:41 | JBernardo | create | |
|