Message193357
Vinay's idea makes sense to me. Paul can also subtly change the patch such that when SCRIPT_WRAPPER is defined, failure to find the wrapper is fatal and prints a message specific to this fact rather than just starting an interactive Python (assuming I read the patch correctly, that is :) Then a new .exe is built named something innocuous, installed in a single well-known location as the "stub" and that pip-style code creating the wrapper has a nice easy job :) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-07-19 12:03:06 | mhammond | set | recipients:
+ mhammond, paul.moore, vinay.sajip, tim.golden, jkloth |
2013-07-19 12:03:06 | mhammond | set | messageid: <1374235386.69.0.102381794244.issue18491@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-07-19 12:03:06 | mhammond | link | issue18491 messages |
2013-07-19 12:03:06 | mhammond | create | |
|