This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author brett.cannon
Recipients Valentin.Lorentz, brett.cannon, pitrou
Date 2013-05-11.18:53:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1368298421.94.0.993447512503.issue17953@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
There is no good way to solve this. At the C level there interpreter struct has two key fields, sysdict and modules. The former is sys.__dict__ and the latter is sys.modules. But when you re-assign sys.modules you then break the assumption that sys.modules is the same dict as that contained in interp->modules. And this all goes out the window as the C code is expected to use interp->modules while the Python code in importlib only has access to sys.modules. The reason this used to "work" is your new dictionary was completely ignored and so we basically a no-op from the perspective of import (done in Python 2.7 but same result in any version up to Python 3.3)::

  >>> import sys
  >>> original_modules = sys.modules
  >>> new_modules = sys.modules.copy()
  >>> sys.modules = new_modules
  >>> import pkg
  >>> 'pkg' in original_modules
  True
  >>> 'pkg' in new_modules
  False

What really needs to happen is that sys.modules needs to be documented as something that cannot be replaced. If you really want to update it cleanly then do ``sys.modules.clear(); sys.modules.update(new_modules)``, but even that is tricky because removing certain modules will flat-out break Python.

I have updated the issue to be a documentation one and added Python 3.4 to the affected versions.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-05-11 18:53:41brett.cannonsetrecipients: + brett.cannon, pitrou, Valentin.Lorentz
2013-05-11 18:53:41brett.cannonsetmessageid: <1368298421.94.0.993447512503.issue17953@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-05-11 18:53:41brett.cannonlinkissue17953 messages
2013-05-11 18:53:41brett.cannoncreate