Message188712
I take your point; I knew there was something bothering me about how the tasks were handled but I didn't consciously see the bug. I like the idea of a ScheduledExecutor.
Yael, thanks a lot for working through this, but I think we should probably close this issue and open a new one for adding a ScheduledExecutor to concurrent.futures, and make see-also link from the Timer class to it. Would you be interested in working on it? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-05-08 10:29:33 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, thaar, pitrou, ajaksu2, neologix, yael |
2013-05-08 10:29:33 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1368008973.87.0.516213837591.issue995907@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-05-08 10:29:33 | r.david.murray | link | issue995907 messages |
2013-05-08 10:29:33 | r.david.murray | create | |
|