This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients flox, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2013-04-07.22:05:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1365372329.44.0.102305287698.issue13126@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I still see a difference between find and rfind, even if the different is low (11%).

$ ./python -m timeit -s 's="ABC"*33; a=((s+"D")*500+s+"E"); b=s+"E"' 'a.find(b)'
10000 loops, best of 3: 93.6 usec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s 's="ABC"*33; a=("E"+s+("D"+s)*500); b="E"+s' 'a.rfind(b)'
10000 loops, best of 3: 84.3 usec per loop

Patched Python:

$ ./python -m timeit -s 's="ABC"*33; a=((s+"D")*500+s+"E"); b=s+"E"' 'a.find(b)'
10000 loops, best of 3: 84.7 usec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s 's="ABC"*33; a=("E"+s+("D"+s)*500); b="E"+s' 'a.rfind(b)'
10000 loops, best of 3: 84.5 usec per loop

I'm unable to explain why GCC (4.7 in my case) produces faster code with the patch, but the patch is simple and does not make the code (much) harder to understand.

So Antoine, please go ahead and apply it.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-04-07 22:05:29vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, pitrou, flox, serhiy.storchaka
2013-04-07 22:05:29vstinnersetmessageid: <1365372329.44.0.102305287698.issue13126@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-04-07 22:05:29vstinnerlinkissue13126 messages
2013-04-07 22:05:29vstinnercreate