➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author neologix
Recipients jcea, mark.dickinson, neologix, pitrou, sbt
Date 2013-03-22.15:31:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH_1eM0gO0qkEXdvmT9Z3TqdbYd3RYfRQn40o2h9ktwm-wZQ4w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <514C77FA.20707@gmail.com>
Content 
> I was under the impression that dict access (and therefore attribute
> access for "simple" objects) was guaranteed to be atomic even in
> alternative implementations like Jython and IronPython.
>
> Is this not a language guarantee?

AFAICT there's no such guarantee.
But even if dict access/assignment was guaranteed to be atomic, this
wouldn't solve the visibility issue.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-22 15:31:53neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, sbt
2013-03-22 15:31:53neologixlinkissue17389 messages
2013-03-22 15:31:53neologixcreate