Message184139
Reviewed the patch - the logic looks okay to me - namely verifying that the changeset the merged with the next +0.1, 3.x branch or default.
I tested.
2.7 -> push -> success.
3.1 -> push -> fail -> merge to 3.2 -> fail -> merge to default -> success.
Looks like a good server-side hgrc hook to have. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-03-14 07:26:27 | orsenthil | set | recipients:
+ orsenthil, loewis, georg.brandl, jcea, pitrou, christian.heimes, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray |
2013-03-14 07:26:27 | orsenthil | set | messageid: <1363245987.31.0.752715291958.issue15917@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-03-14 07:26:27 | orsenthil | link | issue15917 messages |
2013-03-14 07:26:27 | orsenthil | create | |
|