Message183764
I'm not sure how many users asyncore has out there nowadays, but if it has to stay in the stdlib then I see some value in adding a scheduler to it because it is an essential component.
If this is still desirable I can restart working on a patch, although I'll have to go through some of the messages posted earlier in this topic and figure how's best to proceed: whether reusing sched.py or write a separate scheduler in asyncore.py. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-03-08 20:46:23 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients:
+ giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, akuchling, terry.reedy, facundobatista, jafo, josiahcarlson, tseaver, mark.dickinson, pitrou, forest, kevinwatters, djarb, stutzbach, markb, r.david.murray, intgr, mcdonc, j1m, python-dev |
2013-03-08 20:46:22 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1362775582.96.0.308269539127.issue1641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-03-08 20:46:22 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue1641 messages |
2013-03-08 20:46:22 | giampaolo.rodola | create | |
|