This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author neologix
Recipients Trundle, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, loewis, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, terry.reedy, tim.golden, torsten
Date 2013-03-06.21:57:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH_1eM0JjSvc0=B1APkOF5sY4510QaEh9SJvk+R+gZm7EjUSsw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <5137A2EA.9030304@timgolden.me.uk>
Content
> IIRC Nick Coghlan had put a bit of work into this a few months ago as an
> external module with a view to seeing if it got traction before putting
> anything into the stdlib. Might be worth pinging him, or looking to see
> what he'd done. Can't remember the keywords to search for, I'm afraid.
> Something like "directory walker"

Nick's walkdir is "just" an improved walk - with a lot of added
functionality, like filtering etc.
But it's still based on os.walk(), which in turn uses listdir(), since
it's currently the only way to list the content of a directory. So in
short, it won't help for this issue.

To limit the memory usage, on would have to have to use an iterator
based on readdir().
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-06 21:57:45neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, loewis, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, eric.araujo, Trundle, brian.curtin, torsten, nvetoshkin, socketpair, serhiy.storchaka
2013-03-06 21:57:45neologixlinkissue11406 messages
2013-03-06 21:57:45neologixcreate