Message181218
I don't really think they deserve documenting.
pystones can arguably be a cheap and easy way of comparing performance of different systems *using the exact same Python interpreter*. It's the only point of running pystones.
As for pybench, it probably had a point when there wasn't anything better, but I don't think it has anymore. We have a much better benchmarks suite right now, and we also have a couple specialized benchmarks in the tools directory. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-02-02 21:40:08 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, lemburg, flox, docs@python |
2013-02-02 21:40:08 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1359841208.27.0.901880239337.issue15369@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-02-02 21:40:08 | pitrou | link | issue15369 messages |
2013-02-02 21:40:08 | pitrou | create | |
|