Message 179317 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ezio.melotti
Recipients	Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, andrea.bergamini, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, skrah
Date	2013-01-08.07:17:14
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1357629434.9.0.901285594228.issue15438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> Well, the math.pow() doc could use a "seealso" pointing to the built-in > pow() function perhaps. Pointing to ```` is probably better. I think that a simple note that mentions the operator and when it's better to use it (and possibly the limitations of math.pow) is enough. Anyone wants to suggest a specific wording?

> Well, the math.pow() doc could use a "seealso" pointing to the built-in
> pow() function perhaps.

Pointing to ``**`` is probably better.
I think that a simple note that mentions the ** operator and when it's better to use it (and possibly the limitations of math.pow) is enough.
Anyone wants to suggest a specific wording?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-01-08 07:17:15	ezio.melotti	set	recipients: + ezio.melotti, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, skrah, Ramchandra Apte, andrea.bergamini
2013-01-08 07:17:14	ezio.melotti	set	messageid: <1357629434.9.0.901285594228.issue15438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-01-08 07:17:14	ezio.melotti	link	issue15438 messages
2013-01-08 07:17:14	ezio.melotti	create