This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author yos233
Recipients yos233
Date 2012-11-28.07:37:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1354088242.01.0.122460016578.issue16567@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't know if this has been suggested before, none of my searches returned anything. Sorry if it has been rejected already.

Anyone who has used Python at least a little bit will know that you can use +=, -=, *=, and /= to apply a change to a variable and store it in the same variable in one step. (a = a + 1) == (a += 1)

Would it be possible to add a fifth operator, .= (period-equals) to apply a method to a variable in one step? ex:

>> a = "SPAM"
>> a .= lower()
>> a
'spam'

It would make code look a lot better, and easier to write for any longer-named variables. I can see where passing a method of an object by itself would cause an error, but might it be possible for the .= to override this?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-28 07:37:22yos233setrecipients: + yos233
2012-11-28 07:37:22yos233setmessageid: <1354088242.01.0.122460016578.issue16567@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-28 07:37:21yos233linkissue16567 messages
2012-11-28 07:37:21yos233create