Message170629
> The bytes object cannot "leak" so, as you say, checking that refcount
> is pointless. But the view might "leak", and since it does not own a
> reference to the base object we have a problem: we can't deallocate the
> bytes object for fear of breaking the view.
Indeed, that's a problem (but your patch does deallocate the bytes object).
It's quite fishy, I'm not sure how to solve the issue cleanly. Stefan, do you have an idea? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-09-17 23:14:47 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, skrah, sbt |
2012-09-17 23:14:47 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1347923687.67.0.596836727774.issue15903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-09-17 23:14:26 | pitrou | link | issue15903 messages |
2012-09-17 23:14:26 | pitrou | create | |
|