Message 168553 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	sbt
Recipients	chris.jerdonek, georg.brandl, jeremy.kloth, ncoghlan, pitrou, sbt
Date	2012-08-19.10:31:37
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1345372318.98.0.514391418726.issue15526@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I think the reason that it is only this buildbot which fails is that the other Windows buildbots don't use multiple processes. Therefore they don't use a different dir for each test. > 4) change os.startfile() to use ShellExecuteEx and use the hProcess > handle as the return value and use that with os.waitpid() Would this cause a handle leak if os.waitpid() is not used?

I think the reason that it is only this buildbot which fails is that the other Windows buildbots don't use multiple processes.  Therefore they don't use a different dir for each test.

> 4) change os.startfile() to use ShellExecuteEx and use the hProcess
> handle as the return value and use that with os.waitpid()

Would this cause a handle leak if os.waitpid() is not used?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-08-19 10:31:59	sbt	set	recipients: + sbt, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, pitrou, jeremy.kloth, chris.jerdonek
2012-08-19 10:31:58	sbt	set	messageid: <1345372318.98.0.514391418726.issue15526@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-08-19 10:31:37	sbt	link	issue15526 messages
2012-08-19 10:31:37	sbt	create