This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients loewis, meador.inge, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2012-08-03.23:13:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20120804011313.Horde.r5tDQ6GZi1VQHFsJGi1nVwA@webmail.df.eu>
In-reply-to <1344035348.46.0.272644411432.issue15530@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> I am indifferent with respect to the use of the GCC extensions, but  
> getting rid of the umpteen different implementations of MIN/MAX is a  
> nice , albeit very minor, cleanup.

I think that's a different issue from the one we have here, though
(which specifically targets using GCC extensions). I also agree that
combining the MIN/MAX implementation (naturally into Py_MIN/Py_MAX)
is desirable - I don't think that needs an issue.

I'm opposed to reducing the number of times of expression evaluation
on GCC (i.e. statement expressions). If there are cases where the
double evaluation has side effects, I'd rather have it fail on GCC
as well (and not just on MSVC).
History
Date User Action Args
2012-08-03 23:13:14loewissetrecipients: + loewis, pitrou, vstinner, meador.inge
2012-08-03 23:13:13loewislinkissue15530 messages
2012-08-03 23:13:13loewiscreate