Le dimanche 29 juillet 2012 à 17:45 +0000, Meador Inge a écrit :
> Anyway, the way you are implementing the tests has the same issue as Martin pointed
> out for the 'object.__sizeof__' method in issue15402.  I could replace the 
> 'buffered_sizeof' implementation with:
> 
>    static PyObject *
>    buffered_sizeof(buffered *self, void *unused)
>    {
>        Py_ssize_t res;
> 
>        res = 1;
>        if (self->buffer)
>            res += self->buffer_size;
>        return PyLong_FromSsize_t(res);
>    }
> 
> and the tests will still pass.

That's true but, OTOH, I don't think it's very important. First, because
it is a rather unlikely mistake. Second, because the important thing is
to check that the internal buffer is part of the returned size, which is
what Serhiy's test checks for.