Message165782
My current thinking is that adding a "state" property probably isn't worth it given the fact that you can construct this yourself and the requirement for a "history" property is too specialized.
The callback idea seams reasonable and sufficient for your use case. I think that you'd probably want to *not* specify that state change that you want i.e. any state change triggers the function.
What do you think?
(BTW, I'm on leave right now so it might take a while to respond) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-07-18 15:01:22 | bquinlan | set | recipients:
+ bquinlan, pitrou, jjdominguezm |
2012-07-18 15:01:22 | bquinlan | set | messageid: <1342623682.05.0.0158748073113.issue13785@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-07-18 15:01:21 | bquinlan | link | issue13785 messages |
2012-07-18 15:01:20 | bquinlan | create | |
|