Message164977
Something like 127.42.42.42 might be more reliable, because it does not depend on the LAN configuration, only on the local loopback settings.
It is in 127.0.0.0/8 but not in 127.0.0.0/32.
Tested OK here.
127.0.0.0/8 - This block is assigned for use as the Internet host
loopback address. A datagram sent by a higher-level protocol to an
address anywhere within this block loops back inside the host. This
is ordinarily implemented using only 127.0.0.1/32 for loopback. As
described in [RFC1122], Section 3.2.1.3, addresses within the entire
127.0.0.0/8 block do not legitimately appear on any network anywhere.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5735#section-3 |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-07-08 08:45:14 | flox | set | recipients:
+ flox, pitrou, ned.deily |
2012-07-08 08:45:14 | flox | set | messageid: <1341737114.75.0.344524078651.issue15285@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-07-08 08:45:14 | flox | link | issue15285 messages |
2012-07-08 08:45:13 | flox | create | |
|