Message164815
My 4) actually meant that it should always return []. This is what it currently does, so it could be spelled out clearly in the code.
IIRC, getallmatchingheaders() cannot be emulated one-to-one using get_all(), because it handles continuation lines differently. That's why I thought removing or deprecating without fixing it would be the best.
rfc822.Message.getallmatchingheaders() is documented in Python 2, so removing it could make it harder to port code from Python 2 to Python 3. On the other hand, it's broken, so having it removed could actually make things better by not introducing hard-to-find bugs.
All in all, I'm not sure what's the best thing to do. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-07-07 10:43:29 | petri.lehtinen | set | recipients:
+ petri.lehtinen, ggenellina, orsenthil, ezio.melotti, mwatkins, catalin.iacob |
2012-07-07 10:43:29 | petri.lehtinen | set | messageid: <1341657809.63.0.698649285853.issue5053@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-07-07 10:43:28 | petri.lehtinen | link | issue5053 messages |
2012-07-07 10:43:28 | petri.lehtinen | create | |
|