Message 162664 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	bquinlan
Recipients	Nam.Nguyen, bquinlan, r.david.murray
Date	2012-06-12.09:00:12
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1339491614.89.0.115519452892.issue14119@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I've had people request that they be able control the order of processed work submissions. So a more general way to solve your problem might be to make the two executors take an optional Queue argument in their constructors. You'd have to explain in detail in the document how the queues are used. What do you think?

I've had people request that they be able control the order of processed work submissions. So a more general way to solve your problem might be to make the two executors take an optional Queue argument in their constructors.

You'd have to explain in detail in the document how the queues are used.

What do you think?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-06-12 09:00:15	bquinlan	set	recipients: + bquinlan, r.david.murray, Nam.Nguyen
2012-06-12 09:00:14	bquinlan	set	messageid: <1339491614.89.0.115519452892.issue14119@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-06-12 09:00:14	bquinlan	link	issue14119 messages
2012-06-12 09:00:12	bquinlan	create