Message162278
I think the easiest and most intuitive approach is to simply define timestamp() as being the reverse of fromtimestamp(). Don't worry about leap seconds and all that stuff.
If non-1970 epochs are a concern, this could be renamed to posix_timestamp or some such with perhaps a generic timestamp function that takes both a time and epoch.
But let's not let such a useful function not happen just because it won't solve everyone's problem. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-06-04 17:33:09 | Alexandre.Zani | set | recipients:
+ Alexandre.Zani, lemburg, barry, belopolsky, djc, r.david.murray, Alexander.Belopolsky |
2012-06-04 17:33:09 | Alexandre.Zani | set | messageid: <1338831189.04.0.931111112346.issue14908@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-06-04 17:33:08 | Alexandre.Zani | link | issue14908 messages |
2012-06-04 17:33:08 | Alexandre.Zani | create | |
|