Message160741
> So if we add a map argument to that and only pass it to socket if it
> is non-None, wouldn't that maintain backward compatibility with
> current asyncore behavior?
Sorry I was being a bit dense ... it's been a while since I looked at this. I think you are right that the base create_socket could be changed in this way. I'll work up a patch in my sandbox branch (for easier Rietveld integration). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-15 16:25:31 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, terry.reedy, giampaolo.rodola, r.david.murray, maker |
2012-05-15 16:25:31 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1337099131.25.0.703330115786.issue11959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-05-15 16:25:30 | vinay.sajip | link | issue11959 messages |
2012-05-15 16:25:30 | vinay.sajip | create | |
|